All case studies
Casa Beyond scaled to $560K/month without raising CAC - case study cover
Home decorCasa BeyondJune 2025

Casa Beyond scaled to $560K/month without raising CAC

How a premium home decor brand from Australia scaled profitably with margin-led structure

Revenue

$560K

Ad spend

$208K

Conversions

3,920

ROAS

2.69x

Chapter 01

The challenge

Premium home decor with broad campaigns, no SKU prioritisation, and a target to grow without raising CAC.

Casa Beyond is a premium home decor brand based in Australia. The goal coming into the engagement was simple to state and hard to execute: increase revenue without increasing customer acquisition cost. CAC tolerance was already at its sustainable ceiling.

The account had three structural issues. Keyword targeting was too broad to scale without bid pollution. Campaigns mixed intent levels in the same ad group so the bidder couldn't learn cleanly. SKUs were treated equally despite wildly different margin and conversion profiles.

What was wrong on day one

  • Poor keyword targeting: queries leaking into low-intent traffic
  • Campaigns too broad to scale cleanly
  • No SKU-level prioritisation by margin or conversion volume
  • Smart Bidding learning against averaged signal across mixed buyer types

Chapter 02

The playbook

Three changes, run in order.

Three coordinated changes

  1. 1

    Segmented high-AOV SKUs by margin

    Grouped products by margin and conversion volume, then let the data tell us what deserved budget. Scaled proven winners. Cut underperformers. Preserved efficiency across the board instead of forcing one tROAS to fit every SKU.

  2. 2

    Built tight campaign clusters

    Each campaign focused on one collection theme paired with one intent level. Higher CTRs followed. Cleaner data fed Smart Bidding. Better signals for the model to optimise against because the conversion patterns inside each cluster shared a buyer profile.

  3. 3

    Optimised for ROAS at the SKU level, not vanity

    Every decision ran off three numbers per SKU: conversion value over cost, margin per unit, revenue versus ad spend at SKU level. Account-level averages are misleading at this scale. Per-SKU economics tell the truth.

Chapter 03

The results

June 2025 numbers.

June 2025 performance

MetricValue
Tracked revenue$560,000
Ad spend$208,000
Conversions3,920
ROAS2.69x
Pacing for$600K+ next month

Same brand, same product catalogue, same CAC budget. Different account architecture.

Originally published on the daily newsletter

Patrick wrote this case study live the week the numbers landed. Read the original on Beehiiv for the full context.

Read the original write-up

Read next

Want this run on your account?

Free 15-minute audit. No deck. No pitch. We screenshare your account, run the same audit playbook these case studies came out of, and walk away leaving you the doc.

Book the call